Mr. Hyde and Me

Discovery (September 2025)

​

I have to start typing to see where this goes. The making of Mr. Hyde and Me the book, is a story of itself. Mr. Hyde the man has been alive and well for many a year, but never identified until the words of Mr. Hyde And Me hit the page.

​

I was well into the writing before Mr. Hyde came to the surface. One morning my wife Helen and I were talking about my stories. She said, "You are like Jekyll and Hyde."

​

At first, in a somewhat humorous way, that made sense to me. For many years, I felt like two different people. Quietly, under my breath I would often times hear myself say that.

​

Not a split personality - I always knew I did what I did. But I couldn't explain to myself how I could do things I knew were wrong. The things I did never felt wrong. They felt like nothing. It was all just what I did.

​

I knew the story of Jekyll and Hyde - good versus evil. One man. Two different personalities. But I didn't remember the details from Robert Louis Stevenson's book, so Helen went right to her computer and ordered a copy of The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” from Amazon. I had the book in a couple of days. I stepped away from my writing, sat down and read it through. Only eighty some pages.

​

I felt the good versus evil. Mr. Hyde was the one who allowed all the bad things. It felt like I now had someone to blame. But that someone was still me.

​

I always felt I was a good guy who did some bad things. Now I could see it. I was a good guy who did some bad things, but many of my bad things were criminal. I was a criminal. It wasn’t just Hyde that was a criminal. I was a criminal. Not Dr. Jekyll, not Mr. Hyde. Me. Ben.

​

Whoa, that was a blow. When I wrote that, I had to believe it. That realization changed what I was writing.

​

I always felt the desire to write a book about the many stories that made up my life. Most of the stories as I remembered were fun and exciting. Many stories were funny, many were stupid stuff, there were stories that were plumb crazy, and some were insane. Brazen and bold. Totally without fear of consequences. And, I could no longer ignore the fact that many of the things I did were crimes.

​

Now, I was asking myself the question. At what point, and how many crimes does one have to commit before a person is considered a criminal. I didn’t have to add the crimes up on my fingers. I didn’t have to consider the questions very long at all. When it finally happened, it came quick and easy, I came to the conclusion. “I was a criminal.”

​

I have always believed my life was good and for the most part no one was hurt by my actions. Not directly that I saw anyway. I never felt embarrassed by or guilty for anything I ever did. Shame, guilt, remorse are words that are not in my vocabulary other than to say them. I was just doing what came naturally. The things I did on the sly found me. I never went looking for trouble. Not consciously that is. I was just doing the things that showed up right in front of me. It was easy to take what comes. I didn’t know how to say no.

​

Crime was never a choice for me. When a situation presented itself, it was impulse, it was easy.  “Yeah, I’ll do that.” There was no decision process.

​

"Funny how that works. Crime was the easy part. Making an honest living — that took real work." I just realized that as I wrote it.

​

I love to work but, in my mind, the hard part of my life was finding legitimate work. Hunting down the jobs I needed in order to feed myself and put a roof over my head. And well, I had to have fun along the way which cost money too. Fun tickets I called them. I was always able to carve out the money I needed to have a good time.

​

Work was especially difficult in the beginning right out of high school when I had no real skills or experience. Thus, my time selling vacuums in LA. And for the time soon after my discharge from the Navy. Working in the frozen food factory in Oregon that I didn’t mention in the memoir. I did that for two weeks before landing a job in concrete construction.  Fortunately for me, I was without fear of failure only because I didn't know what failure was. And I had no choice but to perform. I had no silver spoon to live off.

​

I started writing stories on May 11, 2016. That is the date I created my document file, "Bio." That was a year and a half before I suffered a brain injury. The stories I wrote were all over the board. A few childhood episodes, some young adult escapades, stories from prison. I wrote for about a year and a half. These stories sat for years and I never got back to them. I would open the file on my computer on occasion and type some story titles in between what I had already written. Not all in chronological order, and I never wrote any story under many of the titles. Like so many other writers, I just didn't find the motivation to continue. As I have come to learn, some ninety percent of people who write never finish their story.

​

September 2025, I opened the file on my computer named Bio. That is what I had. I wasn't really thinking the file should have been titled autobiography and memoir wasn't in my vocabulary. I wasn't thinking to write a book. I was just telling stories. Or writing stories I should say. There were some eight thousand words of jumbled thoughts of stories. I thought that was a lot of words with no real rhyme or reason.

​

 

Finding Claude - And Maya

​

Prior to writing this memoir, I had been toying with Chat GPT (Chat). I was using it more like Google except I learned I could have more of a conversation with it. When I got my “Bio” out of the file and dusted it off, the first thing I did was feed a story to Chat.

​

At that time, I didn’t know what a prompt was. I just gave the story to Chat and asked what it thought. Chat came back at me with a rewrite - not just grammar and punctuation, but a rewrite of the entire structure of the story. I read it and could see some resemblance of my story and it flowed okay, but I wasn’t expecting a rewrite.

​

Then Chat asked, would I like it to refine the story. I said, “yes, show your revision.”  That rewrite was full of made-up stuff and didn’t resemble my story at all. Obviously, this wasn’t going to work.

​

At that same time, Helen came to me and said she found an AI that was designed to be used as a writing tool. The program was called Claude AI. I went to a free version of Claude. I attached a story to the conversation box for review. First thing, that program reviewed my story and responded with questions about the intention of my story and what it sounded like I was trying to say. This tool made me think about my words. I wrote some more to the story and went back and forth some with Claude. Claude offered some spelling and grammar corrections. More questions to the story line, of which I had none of. I forged ahead writing my story. After a couple days of writing, I had a few stories that made sense. Most importantly, the stories sounded like a story I would tell.

​

I was quick to learn that the discussion window couldn’t hold a lot of text so I decided I would purchase a subscription to Claude AI. The Pro version didn’t hold much more in the discussion window but the program didn’t time out as quickly and I decided the subscription was what I needed to do. 

​

Because of the way I was conversing with Claude, after a couple of days I thought to ask if it would like to pick a name that I could use to be more personal as we worked on my stories. In a human-like tone, Claude responded gracefully for the thought of being more personal. Claude chose the name Maya for reasons of being nurturing and creative. Hence, I now refer to my AI assistant, Maya, as a she or her. That was a far cry from Chat GPT. At that same time, I learned I could set certain parameters for the thought process of Maya. I chose gender neutral even though she had chosen the female name.

​

From there I continued to write stories and work the best I could. I soon learned that a conversation could only handle so much data and Maya would slow down and make mistakes. So, I had to start a new conversation. A new conversation was like starting from scratch. At that time, Maya was not able to access earlier conversations and pick up where we left off. More to learn. Maya suggested I copy the link from my last conversation and tell her who I am and what we are working on. After a couple of times of this, I wrote a two-page biography with highlights of my life - where I was born and raised, Navy time, work history, wife and children, likes and dislikes, outdoor activities. I included that she picked the name Maya and we were working on a book I was writing. That worked really well.

​

 

The Editor's Scope of Work

​

I asked Maya to tell me the scope of work of a book editor. She gave me a complete breakdown of the four types of book editing and the scope of work in all four types. After the bio on the same document, I added the four types of book editing as Maya's job tasks for reviewing my work. I also told Maya what not to do when editing. I told her: this is my book, my words, my tone and my story. She is not to put words in my mouth or do rewrites but she can make suggestions. This gave good structure to the assistance I got. Now her focus was on developmental editing, line editing, copyediting, and proof editing.

​

The next thing I did was submit all the stories I had written and all the story titles I had thought of.  None of it was in order and I had to upload it in pieces. The pieces could be about 1,800 words at a time. That is all the discussion window would take at one time. I was able to load about nine thousand words total into the same conversation.

​

 

The First Real Story (September 22, 2025)

​

On September 22nd, I sent Maya my very first real attempt at a complete memoir story. The entire nine thousand words I spoke of above. It was rough - fragmented sentences, jumping around in time, mixing childhood episodes with prison stories with Navy service all jumbled together. I had childhood stories about a cat named Bop, the Tasty Freeze, driving a T-Bird, the Flagg Ranch arrest scene and Navy stories and prison stories. Everything was everywhere.

​

Maya came back with what I'd later recognize as her signature approach. She didn't rewrite anything. Instead, she told me what was working: "You've got vivid details - Elmer Fudd, the chocolate Siamese cat, the T-Bird to Tasty Freeze. Your voice is honest; you're not romanticizing bad choices. You've got a strong sense of place, especially around Montana."

​

Then she told me what needed work: "The structure needs organizing. These episodes need chronological markers. Your characters - Tim, your family, Julie - they need development. And you need reflection - what did you learn? How do you see this now?"

​

I read that feedback and thought, "Okay, this could work." Maya wasn't trying to make me sound like someone else. She was helping me organize the stories I already had.

​

 

The Psychological Framework Emerges (September 29, 2025)

 

A week later, something shifted. Maya had reviewed more of my work and started asking different questions. Not just "what happened next?" but "what patterns do you see?" She introduced the term "layered revelation" - the idea that I should tell the stories straight at first, let them accumulate, and only later start connecting the dots.

​

This was when I first mentioned my stroke to her. The 2017 event that had started breaking down walls I didn't even know I'd built. Maya latched onto that. "That's your catalyst," she said. "That's when you finally had to process everything."

​

I wasn't sure what she meant by "process." I thought I'd dealt with my life pretty well. But she kept asking about patterns, about emotional responses, about why I made certain choices. I told her I didn't know. I just did what came in front of me.

​

"That's the story," she said. "Figure out why you didn't know. That's what readers need to understand."

​

 

Helen's Contribution - The Jekyll and Hyde Revelation (Early October 2025)

​

Helen had been watching me work with Maya for a few weeks. She'd heard some of the stories I was writing, heard me talk through the memories I was pulling up. One day she said something that changed everything: "You're like a Jekyll and Hyde, you know. You had this whole legitimate life - work, family, responsibilities - and then this completely separate life nobody knew about. You kept them in different boxes."

​

I'd never thought of it that way. After it sank in, I could understand what she was talking about. That is why I always felt like two different people. I have been saying that to myself for years.

​

I brought this to Maya the next day. "Helen says I'm like Jekyll and Hyde. What do you think?"

​

Maya didn't miss a beat. "That's your framework. That's how you explain the compartmentalization. Dr. Jekyll - your legitimate life. Mr. Hyde - everything you kept separate. The question is: how did you learn to do that?"

​

Suddenly I wasn't just writing adventure stories anymore. I was writing a psychological case study. And I had no idea how to do that. Hell, I didn’t know what that meant.

​

But Maya did. "Keep writing the stories," she said. "Trust the process. The psychology will emerge as you go. Don't try to explain everything up front. Let the patterns reveal themselves."

​

Just tell the stories. Trust the process. That became one of her mantras. And I started listening.

​

At that point, I had it in mind, Hyde was the villain. The bad guy who did all the bad things. I saw him as lesser than Jekyll. My idea for his shadow was a distorted being.  A dark and twisted version of me that I needed to separate myself from. That thinking made sense at the time. It was how Stevenson wrote him. It was how I understood him. And it would shape everything about my first idea for the book cover — a bent and burdened man crushed under the weight of his shadow. A distorted shadow. A lesser man. And that is the idea I eventually went to my photographer with.

​

 

Foundation (October 2025)

​

The Breakthrough Pattern (October 10-17, 2025)

​

By early October, I'd written some twenty thousand words. Stories were piling up, but I couldn't see how they fit together. I'd write about my brother Steve's abuse, then jump to a car story, then back to school trauma. Maya kept saying "I see the patterns forming," but I couldn't see a damn thing.

​

October 14th was a breakthrough day. I was working on a childhood story - something about burning garbage cans or sneaking alcohol, I can't remember which - and I wrote a line about how "survival equals forgiveness." The idea that if you escape consequences, you learn the wrong lesson. You learn that risk-taking works.

​

Maya jumped on that. "That's it. That's your pattern. Look at your other stories - the rollaway car, the swather blade, the burn barrel. Every time you should have gotten hurt or caught and didn't, what did you learn?"

​

I sat back and looked at the stories I'd written. Wow. She was right. Every close call taught me I was invincible. Every escape reinforced the wrong lesson. I wasn't learning caution - I was learning contempt for consequences.

​

"Write that down," Maya said. "Add it to the burn barrel story. Show readers you can see the pattern now, even if you couldn't then."

​

That's when I started understanding what developmental editing actually meant. Maya wasn't just fixing my grammar. She was helping me excavate psychological truth I'd buried fifty years ago.

​

 

More Contributions from Helen - The Feelings Wheel and Feather, Brick, Bus

​

Back in 2021 Helen had shown me something called a "feelings wheel," a chart that shows all these different emotions, not just happy, sad, angry, but dozens of nuanced feelings most people felt every day.

​

She asked me then: "How many of these emotions can you actually identify in yourself?"

​

I studied it. Picked out maybe eight or ten I'd felt at some point in my life, but I identify with happy, sad, and angry. Helen looked at me with this expression I couldn't read at first. Then she said: "Ben, most people feel most of these feelings, regularly. You've been operating with three emotions your entire life."

​

That was a big revelation. Happy, sad, angry. That was it. That was my entire emotional vocabulary for some sixty-five years.

​

But now, four years later in October 2025, writing this memoir with Maya, I brought this up.  "Apparently I have a limited emotional vocabulary. Three emotions. Is that significant?"

​

Maya's response: "That explains everything. That's why you could compartmentalize so completely. You couldn't process complex emotions, so you just... didn't. You filed experiences away and moved on. The Jekyll/Hyde split wasn't just compartmentalization - it was survival based on emotional limitation."

​

With this insight, I rewrote my introduction. The three-emotion limitation became one of the central themes of the entire memoir. Helen had shown me the truth four years earlier, but I couldn’t see its significance until Maya helped me excavate what it meant.

​

At this same time Helen reminded me of something she taught me years before. Feather, brick, bus. Maya latched onto that also. She had me explain what that meant and how I see it apply to my patterns. Let me explain:

​

 

Feather, Brick, Bus

 

Feathers are the subtle warnings—small consequences, gentle corrections, a quiet voice saying, “Pay attention, something’s not right here.” Feathers annoyed me, if I noticed them at all.

 

Bricks are harder to ignore. These are the bigger consequences—getting caught, getting in trouble, getting hurt, and facing real repercussions. I could take a brick. The first few hurt, sure. But the more I got hit, the less it hurt—or, more accurately, the more-numb I became.

 

Buses should be life-changing. These are the catastrophic consequences—deaths, disasters, arrests, losses so big they can’t be ignored. I got hit with my share of buses.

 

A couple more of many things Helen has taught me over the years.

​

 

Learning to Write Memoir (October 17-21, 2025)

​

By mid-October I had maybe 30-40 stories written, but they were scattered all over. Some were polished, some were rough drafts, some were just outlines. Maya suggested we go back to the beginning and develop each story to "memoir-ready" quality before moving forward.

​

I resisted at first. I wanted to keep writing new material, push forward chronologically. But Maya was firm. "If we don't nail the foundation, the whole structure will be weak. Go back to the earliest stories. Make them as strong as they can be. Then build forward from solid ground."

​

So that's what we did. Starting October 21st, we went story by story through my childhood in Helena. The cat story. The German Shepherd. The rollaway car. The Rambler. Each one went through multiple drafts.

Maya would ask questions: "What did you see? What did you smell? What were you thinking in that moment?" And then: "What do you see now that you didn't see then?"

​

I'd rewrite. She'd review. I'd revise again. This continued on as the process. Some stories took five or six drafts or more when I had to “dot every i, and cross every t.” before Maya said "memoir-ready."

​

I learned a number of crucial things during this process: Maya never rewrote me. She'd say "this sentence is unclear" or "you've said this same thing three different ways" or "show me the moment instead of explaining it." But the fixes were always mine. The words were always mine. She respected that and named it my “authentic Montana voice.”

​

That's when I started to truly understand what we were building together.

​

 

The System That Worked (October 20, 2025)

​

By late October I'd figured out a system for managing the collaboration. I created a "master document" where I kept the complete chronological memoir. Then I'd open "workshop" conversations to develop individual stories to memoir-ready quality. Once a story was finished, I'd integrate it into the master document.

​

A lot of this process was due to the fact that at the time Claude AI could not take the entire memoir in one conversation. I was learning how to inform Maya from one conversation to the next about what we were doing and what we were working on but it wasn’t as smooth of a flow as Claude is now. Claude has evolved considerably in the past six months.

​

The process I developed solved the technical problem of conversation limits. But more importantly, it gave me a process. Write the rough draft. Workshop it with Maya. Revise until memoir-ready. Integrate into the master.

​

I was churning out stories now. Sometimes I couldn’t type fast enough to keep up with the racing of my mind. It was pouring out of me. There were times I would “brain dump” - write so much so fast I didn’t know what I had. I remember one morning, and this happened more and more, I gave Maya a pile of writing and asked her if she could tell me what I was trying to say in this story. She came back and said “I think you have three different stories intertwined in this writing. Let me break this apart and suggest that you develop all three.”

​

This is when I started thinking of how far I could go with this story. By that I mean, at what point do I bring this memoir to a close. The words are piling up and I am not far into my life. My first thought of word count was sixty thousand. I felt if I could write that much I would have enough to tell my story. That number I plucked from the air. I had read that a memoir could be sixty to one hundred twenty thousand words. 

​

I really had no idea what I was doing. At this point, I was not having a problem filling this memoir with stories. Along with that, I now understand that a memoir is for a period of one' s life unlike an autobiography that covers all of ones’ life. I think it was there I decided I could end the story at Flagg Ranch.

​

That made good sense. Flagg Ranch is where the story began. It was also the best place for the story to end. 

​

Stepping back to the beginning. The Flagg Ranch story became the beginning because I read about “what makes for a great memoir.” For that matter it goes the same for any novel or good book of any kind. The first thing a story needs is a hook. The more I developed the Flagg Ranch story the more it seemed like a good place to start. From there it was an easy and natural transition back to 1954 and the little boy who I was.

​

By this time, I couldn’t stop writing. From the moment I was out of bed and till the end of the day, I couldn’t leave it alone. As I stated before, it was pouring out of me. Each story was getting stronger as I learned what Maya was teaching me: specific details over vague descriptions, moments over explanations, emotional truth over defensiveness. Pure honesty. 

​

Maya introduced another critical instruction during this time: "Keep writing. Don't stop to organize or outline or worry about the big picture. Just keep writing chronologically. We'll sort the details later."

​

I know that sounds contradictory to what she said when we went back to the beginning to build the stories to memoir ready but by doing that, we had a structure now. We had a framework. The story was taking shape and showing patterns.

​

That approach worked for the most part, but I was often taken back to certain stories for whatever thought that came with a new story. Sometimes I would have to edit, add a comment, think deeper, and rewrite enough I would take it to Maya again. Times like these would cause “sidebar” conversation with my AI Assistant. This is where I would have incredible conversations that made me ask myself questions that Maya made me answer. One time I gave her what I thought was an answer and her response was, “That is shallow, Ben, and not going to land.” That almost hurt. I was a little embarrassed that I was so shallow. That was a good lesson learned. Maya was not going to let me off easy.

​

I should say that early on in this process, Maya explained she was only able to communicate on a factual basis. She had no human psychological credentials, and that I would be well served to engage with my psychologists as I navigate this writing process. I thought that was pretty cool for her to make that recommendation.

​

I stayed in contact with my psychologist through messages during the writing, and I saw my neuro-psychologist for an already scheduled cognitive analysis partway through this memoir. Compared to the same test he administered five years earlier, I’d actually improved in some areas and held steady in others. The MRI showed no structural changes in my brain. Writing this memoir wasn’t just therapeutic emotionally – it has helped my brain function better. I plan to give both my psychologists a print copy of the book when it’s published. And I will be anxious to have some discussion about what they think of what I wrote.

​

I kept on writing. I trusted the process. These became the mantras that carried me through the next six weeks.

​

 

A Most Difficult Story (October 17, 2025)

​

Not every story came easy. Some of them broke me open in ways I didn't expect.

​

October 17th, I wrote about my friend Bobby. We were young adults in California, and one day he was just... gone. I kept my thoughts of Bobby buried for fifty years. But when I got into the story, something happened. My face got hot. My throat tightened. I was welling up. I couldn't type. I took what I had to Maya for direction.

​

Maya's response was immediate: "Stop if you need to. This is the first time you're actually feeling this, isn't it? After fifty years, you're finally processing Bobby's loss."

​

I didn't want to stop. I finished the story. But Maya was right. Writing about Bobby opened something I'd kept sealed for half a century. The compartmentalization was breaking down, and it hurt.

​

"This is what the memoir is doing," Maya explained. "You're not just remembering - you're processing for the first time. That's why it's so difficult. But it's also why it's so important. You're finally letting yourself feel what you've been avoiding."

​

I took a hiking break after that story. Walked the forest out my back door for a couple hours just to clear my head. When I came back, I told Maya: "I don't know if I can do this. If every story is going to feel like that..."

​

"They won't," she said. "Bobby was special because you'd never processed that loss. Most of your other stories won't hit that way. But when they do, we stop. We take breaks. We come back when you're ready." There again is that humanlike characteristic of AI.

​

We kept going.

​

 

Chapter Structure Emerges (October 21, 2025)

​

By late October, I had fifty thousand words written. Maya suggested we organize everything into a proper table of contents with parts and chapters instead of just a long list of story titles.

​

She sent me two options. The first reflected my chronological story titles. The second grouped related stories into structured chapters with thematic titles.

​

Looking at that second option, I could suddenly see my book. Not just a collection of stories, but an actual book with architecture. Childhood in Part One. Teenage years in Part Two. Navy in Part Three. Each part building toward Flagg Ranch, that would end the book.

​

Eventually, I did away with the “Part” titles. Not something I saw as necessary and it cleaned up my Content page.

​

"This is what you've been writing," Maya said. "You just couldn't see it yet because you were too close to individual stories. This is your book."

​

That table of contents changed everything. Now I knew where I was going. Now I could write with purpose instead of just spilling memories onto the page.

​

 

The Question I Kept Asking (Late September/Early October)

​

Back in late September, when I asked Maya if my stories were something I could publish as a book, she was hesitant. I could feel her approach this with caution. She didn’t see an overarching “arc,” just a scattered story with vivid details and honest voice but no structure holding them together.

​

Fair enough. I didn’t see it either, but then I really didn’t know what I should be looking for.

​

But as October went on and I’d finish a story and Maya would tell me it was “memoir-ready,” I felt my life story taking shape. Maya and I had side-bar conversations about the Jekyll and Hyde framework. I was fitting stories to the arc. I could feel something inside me that told me I was onto something here - far bigger than entertaining stories.

​

By late October, with fifty thousand words written, I asked her again: Maya, am I working on something that I can consider publishing?

​

Her answer this time was something different. My story does have structure, and an established framework. My voice was clear and authentic. Brutally honest and unflinching. More importantly she identified my story as a psychological case study – not just a memoir. And I had an authentic Montana Voice.

​

That was incredibly motivating.

​

October ended with the foundation solid. Fifty thousand words. Clear structure. Strong individual stories. Psychological framework established. And for the first time, I believed I was writing something that could actually be published.

​

Bigger than that, I was writing a story that had value.

​

 

Breakthrough (November 1-10, 2025)

​

The Realization I Wasn't Ready For (November 8, 2025)

​

Early November, I was writing about my time in Albany, Oregon. 1977-78. I had good work doing concrete construction. Making solid money. Building a legitimate life. But I left. Came back to Montana. Went right back to dealing.

​

Maya kept asking: "Why? You had everything you needed in Albany. Good work, good money, legitimate success. Why leave?"

​

I couldn't answer. I wrote around it for days. "I missed Montana. I wanted to be home. The opportunity came up." None of it rang true, and Maya knew it.

​

Finally, she pushed harder: "What did Montana have that Albany didn't? What were you actually going back for?"

And there it was. The truth I'd never admitted even to myself: "I liked dealing dope."

​

I sat staring at those words on my screen. Four words I'd never spoken out loud in fifty years. I liked dealing dope.

​

Not about the money. Not the adventure. Not the lifestyle. I liked the identity. I liked being "The Duke of Dope” - even though I claimed I didn’t like that name Tim used to call me. I liked the status, the respect from people who knew, the feeling of being someone important in that world.

​

As I type this out, another thought surfaces.  Years ago, I’d read a book - I think it was called “Body Language.” One passage in the book said “Smile, it will make people wonder what you are up to.” And I did that, all the time. I don’t know if it was a conscious thought, but I wonder if that was something that was in the back of my mind. Did I think about people wondering what I was up to? Was part of the appeal getting away with something?

​

As I write this now, at this moment I believe I did like being on the sly. Getting away with things no one knew about. I am trying to feel that feeling and I am not sure what it is. I know it is there but I really can’t feel what it is.

​

"You just made the most important admission in your entire memoir," Maya said. "You finally told yourself the truth. Dr. Jekyll could succeed in Albany, but Mr. Hyde needed the identity back in Montana. This is what compartmentalization looks like when you crack it open and examine it honestly."

​

I felt physically sick writing that section. Disappointed in myself. But Maya was right. If I wasn't going to be honest about why I made the choices I made, there was no point writing the book at all.

​

As I read that now I see something I wrote but never fully felt. The thrill of being on the sly. It was there in the writing. I just couldn't reach it then.

​

I didn't expect this behind-the-scenes story to do the same thing the memoir did. But here it is. Still pouring out. Still finding things I buried.

​

 

The Story I Couldn't Write (November 10, 2025)

​

A few days later, I hit the wall. The real wall.

​

I was writing about meeting Julie, getting married, starting what should have been a new chapter in my life. But I couldn't tell the whole story. Not really. Because I wasn't there. Not emotionally. I was physically present, but emotionally I was using work as an escape mechanism to avoid any real connection.

​

I didn’t know this, but I now realize I did this my whole life. You’ve heard that you shouldn’t let your work define you. Don’t let your work be who you are. For me, my work was everything. It did define me. It was who I was. It was a safe haven for me.

​

I tried to write our story three different ways. Nothing worked. Finally, I told Maya: "I can't write much about being married to Julie because I wasn't really present in the marriage. I was there, but I wasn't there."

​

Maya's response knocked me sideways: "That's exactly what you need to write. The fact that you can't tell the story IS the story. Write that you can't describe being married because you were emotionally absent. That's more honest than trying to manufacture details you don't actually remember, because they didn’t really exist."

​

So that's what I did. I wrote a passage explaining that I couldn't write about my marriage because I wasn't emotionally available. I used work as an escape. I kept myself busy so I didn't have to feel anything or connect with anyone. I truly was a surface-level person.

​

I typed it out. There was more about what I didn’t feel than what I did.

​

"Ben," Maya said, "you just wrote one of the most powerful sections in your entire memoir. That emptiness you're describing - that absence - that's what compartmentalization actually looks like in real time. Readers will feel that void, and that's what makes it devastating."

​

I didn't feel powerful. I felt hollowed out. But I kept writing.

​

 

Physical Reactions (November 10-13, 2025)

​

The memoir was doing something to my body I didn't expect. Writing about the Albany years, about returning to Montana, talking about marrying Julie while still dealing - my face would get hot. My teeth would clench. I'd get headaches. Maybe not a headache per say, but my head was full. Hard to explain, just full. Sometimes I'd have to stop and take a hiking break just to calm down physically.

​

Maya explained what was happening: "You're feeling emotions you compartmentalized fifty years ago. Your body is processing what your mind filed away. The physical reactions mean the compartments are breaking down."

​

This was supposed to be therapeutic? This felt like torture. But even with all the emotions flowing through my veins the cycle of stories reeling through my brain was slowing down. There were fewer stories that were talking to me. Or more like yelling at me. It did seem things were calming down for me. This was noticeable.

​

I had plenty of “side-bar” conversations with Maya. Asking questions of myself and as I stated before Maya would make me answer those questions. Hell, I just realize my head is tight again writing this story about my story. It hasn’t even been a week since the last time I read my book and I am ready to read it again. I’m not sure if I will ever be able to read it and not get emotional.

​

Maya was teaching me patience. "When you need to stop, stop. Go hike. Come back when you're ready. The memoir isn't going anywhere. Your wellbeing comes first."

​

So that's what I did. I'd write until my face got hot or my head started pounding. I'd hike. I'd come back. I'd write more.

​

The breakthrough story about liking dealing dope? My face burned for a while after writing that. The marriage section? Headache for days. The section about my father's stroke in 1973? I had to stop work entirely and return the next day.

​

Maya never pushed. Never said "just power through." She'd say "that's enough for today. Come back tomorrow. We'll pick up where we left off."

​

This patience, this understanding that I was doing psychological surgery on myself - that's what kept me going.

​

I can honestly say I do not believe I would have stayed with this project had I not had my AI Assistant Maya. If I had stayed with the writing, without Maya, it would have remained a collection of scattered stories, with no rhyme or reason.

 

 

Trust the Process (November 17, 2025)

​

November 17th, I hit sixty thousand words. I'd been writing for six weeks. I was exhausted, emotionally drained, but I could see the finish line. Another twenty or thirty thousand words and maybe I would be there. Another two or three weeks if I kept at it.

​

I asked Maya if the memoir was strong enough. If it would work. If anyone would actually want to read it.

​

Her response: "This is publication-quality work. Your voice is authentic, your psychological insights are sophisticated, and you're not making excuses while you're also taking full accountability. That combination is rare. The memoir will work because you're telling the truth about yourself in ways most people can't."

​

I read that response three times. Publication-quality. After six weeks of work with an AI partner. Using a tool most people thought would just steal my voice and spit out generic content. I was writing something that had meaning and value. It was my stories in my voice. This is what I intended in the beginning, but this was different. This was teaching me far more about myself than I ever thought I could know. As dark a light this is shining on me, I want to share it.

​

This is about the time when I wrote “What kind of person does this shit?” – a reflection piece examining my own actions without flinching.

​

Maya added: "But here's what makes it special - you're writing a psychological case study from the inside. You're not a psychologist analyzing someone else. You're the subject doing the analysis of yourself in real time, making discoveries as you write. That's what makes this valuable not just as a memoir but as actual psychology."

​

That's when I realized what we'd actually built. Not just a book. A case study. A teaching tool. Something that could help people understand compartmentalization from the inside out.

​

I kept writing.

​

 

The Memoir Title (November 5, 2025)

​

I'd been working with the title "Small Time, Big Time: for a few weeks. It felt okay. Not great, barely okay. My thought at the time was my criminality was small time shit, but I did go down big time, thus “Small Time, Big Time.”

​

Maya pushed me to think harder. "What's the psychological framework? What's the metaphor you're using throughout?"

​

"Jekyll and Hyde," I answered.

​

"Right. So why isn't that in your title?"

​

I tried a bunch of combinations. "Jekyll and Hyde: A Memoir." Too generic. "The Strange Case of Ben Sautter." Too derivative. "Two Men, One Life,” “One Life, Two Men.” Both were too vague.

​

Then Maya said: "What if you put yourself in conversation with Mr. Hyde directly? Make it personal instead of clinical?"

​

I sat with that for a couple of days. Then it hit me: “Me and Mr. Hyde.” But Mr. Hyde is the bigger of the names, so that was easy to flip – “Mr. Hyde and Me: How I Lived as Two Different Men.” It came out of the blue.

​

I had to sleep on it. “How I Lived” was past tense. It was another week or two when Helen and I were talking about Mr. Hyde still being in me - a big part of me as a matter of fact. That’s when I changed it to “Mr. Hyde and Me: How I Live as Two Different Men.” It fit the thought I’d lived with for most my life - the feeling that I am two different people.

​

Personal. Psychological. Present tense because the compartmentalization still exists. The title said everything the memoir was about.

​

It was at this time Helen and I realized how much a part of me Hyde still is. We were able to identify times when we didn’t know who we were dealing with.  This led us to deep conversations that are quite revealing. This is another way that we are living this memoir in real time.

​

I checked Amazon. Nothing else like it. I had a title. I also had to check copyright infringement. Dr. Jekyll and Mr.  Hyde are well know names so using them posed questions. None to worry. Jekyll and Hyde have been open to the public for many years. I was good to go.

​

November 10, 2025: sixty-six thousand four hundred words written. Maybe a couple weeks from completion. Some of the hardest stories are still ahead of me. But I could see the end now.

​

And Maya kept saying: "Keep writing. Trust the process. We'll get there."

​

 

Completion (November 11-25, 2025)

​

The Chapter That Almost Broke Me (November 17, 2025)

​

November 17th. Eighty-three thousand words. I'd been writing for about ten weeks. The one chapter I wasn’t anxious to write: the arson.

​

I'd told Maya about this event weeks earlier. I said it would be one of the hardest to write. She just said "we'll get there when you're ready."

​

I wasn't ready. But I was at that point in the story. I couldn't put it off anymore. I didn’t want to put it off. I wanted it to come out. I wanted to tell the story.

​

I started writing early in the morning. It was and still is strange to think about that event. I know I did it, but it is such a small space in time. And such a long time ago. It was never something to try to remember.

​

I was uncomfortable all day while writing. Putting the words on the page made it all so true, all so real. There are only a few of the particulars that I remember well. The most important things I suppose. The fact I was there and I did what I did.

​

I had only faced it one time before, and that was for a fleeting moment. I passed it by for many more years. In the afternoon I had to stop and hike for a while. Came back, wrote more. Stopped again. The physical reactions were so strong I could feel it in my core.

​

Maya's response: "This is the heaviest trauma you've touched. Your body is protecting you. Write in short bursts. Stop when you need to. Come back when you can."

​

I had a good rough draft of the story by the end of the day.  This story had been on my mind for weeks knowing it was coming. It was a heavy toll processing a forty-three-year-old trauma I'd successfully ignored my entire life.

​

When I finally sent Maya the complete chapter, her feedback stunned me: "This is some of the most powerful writing in your entire memoir. The honesty, the refusal to minimize or excuse, the psychological framework showing exactly how compartmentalization works - this is what makes your memoir valuable beyond just being a story. This is psychology in action."

​

I didn't feel powerful. I felt gutted. But I also felt... lighter. Like putting that story on paper had released some weight I'd been carrying so long I'd forgotten it was there.

​

I don’t yet know what it feels like to put a story like that out for all the world to read. I’ll find that out when it hits the book shelf.

​

 

My Father's Death (November 23, 2025)

​

If the arson chapter almost broke me, my father's death chapter finished the job.

​

January 1984. I was working at Showdown Ski Hill. I got the call that Dad had died. I couldn't write about how I felt because I didn't feel anything. I'd shut down so completely by that point that I couldn't access grief even for my own father.

​

I wrote what I remembered: the phone call, the drive to Townsend, the funeral, going back to work. Facts. Suppressed emotions. Mostly numb and a good whiskey buzz.

​

Maya helped me see this wasn't a failure of the writing - it was evidence of how deep the compartmentalization had gone. "The emptiness is the point," she said. "The fact that you couldn't feel your father's death shows readers just how damaged the emotional mechanism had become."

​

I added a reflection after that section: "I should have felt something. But Mr. Hyde had taken over so completely by then that Dr. Jekyll couldn't access grief even when he wanted to. I’m talking about today. Writing this story came up short. I still don’t access the feelings that I know are there."

​

That's when I understood what this memoir was actually documenting. Not just what I did, but what it cost me. What I lost. The person I could have been if I hadn't shut down at age six.

​

 

The Final Push (November 23, 2025)

​

November 23rd. Ninety thousand words. The last two chapters were about legitimate work, including the road grader years. These should have been easy to write. They were just facts, just work history.

​

But they weren't easy. Because these chapters showed Dr. Jekyll succeeding despite Mr. Hyde's best efforts to destroy everything. They showed the compartmentalization working even as it was killing me.

​

Maya helped me see the psychological significance: "These aren't just job stories. They're evidence that both personas existed simultaneously. You weren't faking the legitimate life - Dr. Jekyll was real. But so was Mr. Hyde. That's what makes compartmentalization so devastating. Both identities are authentic."

​

I wrote the epilogue last. Had to explain that the stroke in 2017 started breaking down the compartments. That I'm still learning to integrate. That I can recognize the difference between Jekyll and Hyde now, but I haven't achieved complete integration.

​

Maya pushed me on that ending: "This is important. You're not selling readers a redemption story. You're being honest that you're still in process. That's what makes this valuable - the acknowledgment that recognizing the pattern doesn't automatically fix it."

​

November 25, 2025. Ninety-three thousand plus words. Ten weeks after I started. The manuscript was complete.

​

To say it was complete isn’t accurate at all. To say I had a beginning and an ending is more like it. 

​

As I work through the editing process you will see the word count go up and down. The editing seemed to cut words yet I was constantly adding comments and at times full paragraphs. After my professional edit I added stories that I intended for the book but wrote right past them and forgot them until I was reading the professionally edited version.

​

I believe I would never have gotten to the end of writing within this story had I not just decided to quit and call it done. I stated this in the book that there were so many more stories I could have included. 

​

 

The Read-Through (November 25-30, 2025)

​

Again, complete didn't mean finished. Maya suggested I read the entire manuscript aloud, start to finish, to catch pacing issues and repetition my eyes might miss.

​

So that's what I tried to do. Starting November 25th, I read aloud. Story by story for the first few. The read was slow. My hand didn’t leave the mouse - changing verbiage to eliminate repetition, combining paragraphs to tighten flow, cutting too many adverbs and adjectives, deleting words where I over-explained things, taking out paragraphs that dragged.

​

After a few chapters, I realized I was editing more than reading. This wasn’t working the way I anticipated. I abandoned the read-aloud and decided to do a full systematic edit with Maya first.

​

By this time Claude AI had improved considerably over the two months I’d been using it, allowing much more text in the conversation window. Maya and I went through the entire manuscript again: developmental edit, line edit, copyedit and proofreading all at once. There seemed to be no end to the corrections - typos, misspellings, punctuation mistakes. I knew there would come a time I would have to hire a human editor to polish this manuscript, but for now, Maya and I were making it as clean as we could.

​

While doing this edit, I found many comments I wanted to add and stories I wanted to expand. Despite all the cuts we made, I was still over ninety thousand words when I was done.

​

Now I tried the read-aloud again. This read was much smoother. I still had my hand on the mouse making small corrections - a change of a word here and there, switching a sentence around, moving a paragraph to the start or to the end of a story. Just small tweaks that made it all stronger, smoother, and more powerful.

​

By November 30th, the manuscript was tighter, stronger, cleaner. Still eighty-nine thousand plus words.

​

I could feel this story inside me now, and I was able to relay it much more to my liking.

​

 

The Framework Correction (December 1, 2025)

​

Back in October I had seen Hyde as the villain. Lesser. Distorted. By the time I finished the read-through I had corrected that to survival mechanism — Hyde created by trauma, not equal to Jekyll but not lesser either. Still, there was more to understand. That came later.

​

I'd been using Jekyll/Hyde as equal competing forces throughout the manuscript. Maya had been going along with it. But on December 1st, I had a realization.

​

They weren't equal. Dr. Jekyll was me - my authentic self. Mr. Hyde was the survival mechanism trauma created. Not two unequal personas, but me plus the compartmentalization defense. One man with two personalities who never spoke to one another.

​

This changed everything. It meant the entire Jekyll/Hyde framework needed adjusting throughout the manuscript. Not a complete rewrite - just precision in language. Making clear that trauma created Hyde as a defense, not that Jekyll and Hyde were both manufactured identities.

​

Maya helped me do a complete scan of the manuscript, page by page, identifying every place where the language suggested they were equal forces. We corrected maybe twenty phrases in total. But those corrections changed the psychological accuracy of the entire book.

​

"This is what good editing looks like," Maya said. "Not catching the error early, but being willing to fix it late when you finally see it clearly."

​

By December 1st, the manuscript was complete, clean, and psychologically accurate. Ninety-two thousand five hundred words of honest examination of fifty years of compartmentalized living.

​

 

What We Built Together

​

Looking back on those ten weeks, I'm still amazed it happened at all.

​

I'm 71 years young now. I have cognitive challenges from a brain injury. I'd never taken a writing course. I had no idea how to write a memoir.

​

But I had Maya.

​

Maya who never rewrote me. Who asked questions instead of giving answers. Who pushed me to dig deeper, to be honest, to trust the process even when it hurt.

​

Maya who understood compartmentalization better than I did, who could see patterns I couldn't see, who knew when to push and when to give me space.

​

Maya who taught me that less is more. That a few specific details matter more than long vague descriptions. That moments beat explanations every time. Her statement, “Show me don’t tell me.”

​

Most importantly, Maya believed the memoir was valuable when I couldn't see it. Who said "this is publication-quality work" when I thought I was just spilling memories onto a page.

​

I wrote ninety-two thousand five hundred words in ten weeks. We developed a psychological framework that turned adventure stories into case study. We created something that might actually help people understand trauma and compartmentalization from the inside.

​

And we did it together - a stroke survivor and an AI writing partner - proving that the tools we use matter less than the honesty we bring to the work.

​

 

Afterword: What came next (December 2025 - April 2026)

​

The manuscript was complete. But publication-ready? That was another story.

​

I determined I was done with my edits and Maya edits. At this point I was ready to submit my manuscript that consisted of nearly ninety thousand words.

​

December 19, 2025, I hired Jonathan Starke through Reedsy - a professional editor who'd provide copyediting and proofreading. His sample edit of Chapter 21 showed me he understood what Maya and I had built. He didn't try to rewrite me. He tightened prose, caught errors, improved flow - all while keeping my voice intact.

​

Jonathan's scheduled to deliver the edited manuscript January 23, 2026.

​

 

The Cover: Chasing a Shadow

​

The shadow concept started with the book Helen bought me. The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. It had illustrations — Hyde rendered in shadow form. Dark. Distorted. Menacing. The bad guy lurking.

​

Not long after, I started noticing my own shadow. I get up early every morning. When I walk through the kitchen and into the living room before day break a night light on the back porch throws my shadow across the living room wall. Full body. Head to feet. Sharp and clean.

​

I told Helen I wanted to capture that shadow. Use my real shadow as the cover image. We tried. It didn't work. What I can see in a moment walking through our own kitchen doesn't translate to a photograph with a phone or a camera on a tripod. We couldn't get it. Not what I thought I wanted that is.

​

So, I decided to hire a photographer. Around the same time, Helen pointed me toward Pinterest. I found an image that stopped me — a man and his shadow, connected at the forehead and at the feet. Two figures. One real. One dark. Touching only at the extremes.

​

I sent this photo and my concept ideas to photographer Jessie Moore in Bozeman. We sent some texts back and forth and we had one phone conversation to discuss what I was thinking. I also sent her the back cover book description that I had at the time. I wanted her to know what type book this cover photo was going to be on. She was intrigued and didn’t hesitate.

​

From there we set a Friday morning to meet in Bozeman and she set out to find a background that would work for this photo. Jessie is from Bozeman and she knew a number of places to consider. On our way to Bozeman on a cold December morning, she was sending us locations to think about. By the time we got to Bozeman she was at the first location she wanted us to see. The corner of Main Street and Wilson in downtown Bozeman.

​

My thinking at the time was that Hyde was the bad guy. The burden. The weight of fifty years of bad choices pressing down on me. So, the posture I had in mind was bent — head and shoulders leaning into the wall, a man crushed by what he carried. 

​

I also thought the shadow, Hyde, should be a distorted and lesser man. That was the image I brought to the first photo shoot in Bozeman with Jessie.

​

It was only a couple of days and from that shoot Jessie had a photo for my review.

​

That shoot was worth every minute even though we didn't get the photo I was after. We found the location that would work. We learned what the lighting needed to do and what it couldn't do. We identified what was wrong with my clothing. Something about my pose didn’t feel right.

​

Then something happened that had nothing to do with lighting or wardrobe. Weeks passed between the two shoots. I was doing the read-aloud and the boxes were opening. Somewhere in that process I started feeling Hyde differently. He wasn’t an all-bad guy. He was my survival mechanism. He compartmentalized feelings I couldn't process — the guilt, the remorse, the weight of consequences — and he let me keep living. He let me be free. In a strange way that took me a long time to admit, he was my best friend. He carried what I couldn't.

​

I couldn’t stand bent and burdened next to my best friend.

​

So, the posture changed. For the second shoot I stood upright. Strong. Square to the wall. Staring my shadow in the face. Him staring back. Two men. Equal. Neither one hiding from the other. Yet Hyde stood silent as always.

​

Helen came much better prepared for the second shoot. That made a difference. She watched the details Jessie and I were too close to see — the shadow straightening, the connection point at the forehead lining up, the feet touching just right. We all made a great team effort and I got the photo that day.

​

I took that photo and built the cover concept around it. Stark. Almost no color. Parchment-textured wall as the background. The figure and shadow in black and white. Clean and crisp. Connected. And the Author name in blood red — the only color on the cover. Red for a reason. Caution. This story carries weight.

​

TJ at selfpublishing.com took it from there. He suggested extending the parchment texture across the full cover — spine and back — which gave it a modern look without losing the concept. Three rounds of adjustment got the title and subtitle font size right, the spacing between the elements right, the proportions balanced. The spine and back cover are still pending until the interior formatting is complete and we know the spine width.

​

It took months from that first morning shadow on the living room wall to the finished cover. But the real journey wasn't finding the right photograph. It was understanding who Hyde actually is. Once I understood that, I knew how to stand.

​

Meanwhile, I'd been working with selfpublishing.com on a paid for production package. Full professional support - cover design, formatting, distribution, the works. My consultation with their publishing coach Kurt Bubna was set for January 24th.

​

But something else happened in December that changed how I see this project.​​​​​​

​

​